|
Post by vizari on Apr 6, 2015 14:23:29 GMT
Okay, two ideas here.
First, villages we have on a personal level. Our groups could have countries. And countries can build things like infrastructure, schools, etc. But, those can only be bought with BC. So, the group leader can set up a BC tax in order to expand upon the buildings of which its members will gain benefits. This, of course, would only properly work with limited group size. Group size could perhaps start at 5 and be expanded to 25 with use of infrastructure.
Further more, countries could wage war with other countries and gain rank when they beat them.
Second idea: Increase scientist cost depending on reached tresholds. For example, +1bc per 100k scientists. This will make it harder to increase them at a later level allowing newer players more of a chance to catch up and maybe even surpass if active enough.
|
|
|
Post by reznal on Apr 6, 2015 14:29:35 GMT
I very much like the idea of group countries, you could also have the option to donate BC to the country, the restriction to members would definitely have to be limited.
|
|
|
Post by sause01 on Apr 6, 2015 14:54:12 GMT
I would suggest to make the maximum Members to 40-50, because 25 is very low.
|
|
|
Post by runedaegun on Apr 6, 2015 15:11:00 GMT
maybe starting at 10 and do +5 per building of a special building that costs alot....like a serious amount alot lol.
startng at 5 seems a bit smallish. max at i'd say 25 or 30 seems about right. (any larger and you get supergroups aka Chat Breakers or BoL)
|
|
|
Post by vizari on Apr 6, 2015 17:04:11 GMT
Larger could be possible if the game becomes popular enough. But at its current population, more than 25/30 would leave for just a few active groups.
|
|
wyrdo
New Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by wyrdo on Apr 6, 2015 17:54:19 GMT
I'd like to add a little bit on the countries aspect. I love the idea of it and think that anything like taxes or donations be setup in a way that it is going to the group and not the group leader. So any funds/bc that goes into the group can only go towards the group infrastructure (as suggested) as this could easily be abused by greedy tryhards stealing the group's input. Just a thought
|
|
|
Post by vizari on Apr 6, 2015 18:25:22 GMT
Oh yeah, Wyrdo. I wouldn't have it any other way. My apologies for not making that clear.
|
|
|
Post by lanza on Apr 8, 2015 9:43:16 GMT
I like this idea a lot, I'll probably do it
|
|